Table 3 Secondary outcome measures post-simulation training (A) perceived usefulness of training (B) improvement in communication
(A) | Author, year | Perceived usefulness of training (post-simulation training assessment) % that rated useful |
Tahtali et al. 2017 [52] | 88.4% | |
Ajmi et al. 2019 [60] | 90.0% | |
Bohmann et al. 2022 [63] | 95.5% | |
Svobodova et al. 2023 [65] | 85.0% | |
(B) | Author, year | Improvement in communication (post-simulation training assessment) |
Tahtali et al. 2016 [47] | Improved to 90.0% | |
Svobodova et al. 2023 [65] | Improved to 77.0% |