Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographics and background of participants

From: Transcutaneous cardiac pacing competency among junior residents undergoing an ACLS course: impact of a modified high fidelity manikin

Characteristics

Control cohort (n = 50)

Intervention cohort (n = 50)

P value

Age, years, mean (SD)

26 (3)

25 (2)

0.07

Male, n (%)

23 (46)

13 (26)

0.04

Family medicine residents, n (%)

29 (58)

28 (56)

0.99

Time since ACLS course, n (%)

0.77

 No previous ACLS course

31 (62)

34 (68)

 < 12 months

6 (12)

6 (12)

 > 12 months

13 (26)

10 (20)

Hours of preparation for the ACLS course, n (%)

0.88

 0–4

30 (60)

29 (58)

 5–10

15 (30)

17 (34)

 > 10

5 (10)

4 (8)

Previous simulation experience, n (%)

0.05

 None

5 (10)

6 (12)

 Low-fidelity

30 (60)

18 (36)

 High-fidelity

15 (30)

26 (52)

Previous clinical experience with unstable bradycardia, n (%)

5 (10)

0 (0)

0.02

Previous experience with TCP, n (%)

1 (2)

0 (0)

0.32

  1. ACLS advanced cardiovascular life support; SD, standard deviation; TCP, transcutaneous pacing