Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of the self-questionnaire assessing response process validity evidence in the three groups

From: Assessing validity evidence for a serious game dedicated to patient clinical deterioration and communication

  Group S
n = 25
Group R
n = 25
Group E n = 21 p
Q1. Do you think that this serious game provided a complete and good nursing care experience with respect to the medical content and educational objectives? 1 (No, not at all) to 10 (completely correct and good)
 Post-operative haemorrhage scenario 7.8 ± 1.2 8.0 ± 1.3 7.8 ± 1.3 0.83
 Brain trauma scenario 7.8 ± 1.3 7.0 ± 1.3 8.2 ± 1.0 0.48
 Obstructed intestinal tract scenario 7.5 ± 1.4 7.7 ± 1.5 7.5 ± 1.4 0.86
Q2. Do you think that this serious game was realistic?
1 (not realistic) to 10 (very realistic)
7.7 ± 1.4 7.0 ± 1.6 7.5 ± 1.4 0.25
Q3. Do you think that the clinical scenario was realistic? 1 (not realistic) to 10 (very realistic)
 Post-operative haemorrhage scenario 8.0 ± 2.0 7.7 ± 1.6 8.2 ± 1.1 0.50
 Brain trauma scenario 8.1 ± 1.4 7.8 ± 1.3 8.6 ± 0.7 0.07
 Obstructed intestinal tract scenario 7.4 ± 2.0 7.6 ± 1.4 8.0 ± 1.1 0.39
Q4. Do you think that the history-taking was realistic? 1 (not realistic) to 10 (very realistic) 7.9 ± 1.3 7.4 ± 1.4 7.5 ± 1.2 0.41
Q5. Do you think that the clinical exam was realistic? 1 (not realistic) to 10 (very realistic)
 Post-operative haemorrhage scenario 7.8 ± 1.2 7.7 ± 1.4 8.1 ± 1.0 0.53
 Brain trauma scenario 8.0 ± 1.0 7.8 ± 1.3 8.1 ± 1 0.58
0.76
 Obstructed intestinal tract scenario 7.5 ± 1.5 7.8 ± 1.3 7.8 ± 1.1  
Q6. Do you think that the care report was realistic? 1 (not realistic) to 10 (very realistic) 8.5 ± 1.0**,**** 7.5 ± 1.6 7.4 ± 1.9 0.02*
Q7. Do you think that the graphics and animations were realistic?
1 (not realistic) to 10 (very realistic)
8.4 ± 0.9 7.6 ± 1.3 7.8 ± 1.7 0.06
Q8. Overall, are you satisfied with this serious game as an educational tool?
1 (not satisfied) to 10 (very satisfied)
7.0 ± 1.5 7.0 ± 1.7 7.0 ± 1.5 0.98
Q9. Do you think that incorporating the serious game concept improves your training?
1 (No, not at all) to 10 (Yes, very much)
8.4 ± 1.2 7.7 ± 2 6.9 ± 2.9 0.05
Q10. Do you think that this tool increases your skills?
1 (No, not at all) to 10 (Yes, very much)
8.4 ± 1.5 7.7 ± 1.8 5.5 ± 2.1**,*** < .0001*
Q11. Do you think that this training will have an impact on your professional work? 1 (No, not at all) to 10 (Yes, very much) 7.3 ± 1.3 6.8 ± 1.8 4.4 ± 1.9**,*** < .0001*
Q12. Would you recommend this training to other students or colleagues?
1 (No, not at all) to 10 (Yes, very much)
8.8 ± 1.2 8.2 ± 1.5 8.1 ± 1.8 0.17
  1. Results are described as means ± SD and compared using ANOVA (followed by post hoc comparison when significant)
  2. **Group E ≠ S with p < 0.05
  3. ***Group E ≠ group R with p < 0.05
  4. ****Group S ≠ group R with p < 0.05