Skip to main content

Table 2 Simulator assessment metrics

From: Development and validation of a simulation-based assessment tool in colonoscopy

Metrics

Novices (n=8) median (range)

Intermediates (n=8) median (range)

Experts (n=8) median (range)

p value

Mucosa visualized (%)

 Case 4

78.5 (19–88)

89 (80–92)

80.5 (72–91)

0.003†

 Case 7

83.5 (17–87)

89.5 (82–94)

82 (72–88)

Time with clear view (%)

 Case 4

94 (80–99)

94 (93–97)

96.5 (94–99)

0.027*

 Case 7

92.5 (89–98)

94.5 (89–98)

97 (93–99)

Time to cecum (s)

 Case 4

319 (297–545)

227 (144–360)

178 (122–268)

0.002†

 Case 7

321 (240–591)

207 (164–322)

204 (103–258)

Intubation of terminal ileum (n)

 Case 4

0/8

6/8

5/8

0.014‡

 Case 7

5/8

7/8

7/8

Extensive loop formation (s)

 Case 4

0 (0–12)

0 (0–9)

0 (0–4)

0.183§

 Case 7

3.5 (0–75)

1 (0–8)

0 (0–19)

Hazardous tension (n)

 Case 4

0 (0–4)

1 (0–2)

0 (0–1)

0.329

 Case 7

1 (0–4)

0.5 (0–3)

1 (0–2)

Aggregate score (points per minute)

 

8.9 (4.2–17.8)

23.1 (13.0–37.2)

31.1 (13.9–51.2)

<0.000*

  1. The seven metrics of the Simbionix GI Mentor provided automatically for each of the two cases. The three groups were compared with: *variance analysis, Kruskal-Wallis test, Fisher’s exact test, §negative binominal regression, or Poisson regression