Skip to main content

Table 2 Item analysis. Percent of learners correct by procedural step: control vs. treatment at pre- and post-test

From: Putting the “learning” in “pre-learning”: effects of a self-directed study hall on skill acquisition in a simulation-based central line insertion course

Procedural step

Pre-test

Post-test

Control

Treatment

Normalized gain or loss

(% of possible)

Control

Treatment

Normalized gain or loss

(% of possible)

01. Administer informed consent

100%

91%

 − 9%

100%

100%

0%

02. Lead time-out

7%

18%

12%

100%

68%

 − 32%

03. Don hat and mask

74%

77%

12%

72%

100%

100%

04. Unpack bundle and line kit

63%

41%

 − 35%

80%

95%

75%

05. Clean area with chlorhexidine

11%

45%

38%

52%

73%

44%

06. Don gown and gloves

22%

36%

18%

64%

77%

36%

07. Prepare insertion kit

11%

59%

54%

20%

91%

89%

08. Apply sterile drape

7%

36%

31%

56%

55%

 − 2%

09. Apply sterile sheath to ultrasound probe

37%

64%

43%

72%

82%

36%

10. Set bed to Trendelenburg

44%

45%

2%

64%

86%

61%

11. Inject lidocaine

26%

45%

26%

72%

77%

18%

12. Advance seeker needle with ultrasound

30%

45%

21%

96%

82%

 − 15%

13. Acquire venous return

44%

50%

11%

92%

82%

 − 11%

14. Confirm guidewire with ultrasound

0%

27%

27%

44%

68%

43%

15. Knick skin

11%

23%

13%

88%

82%

 − 7%

16. Dilate vein

19%

41%

27%

96%

91%

 − 5%

17. Advance catheter

15%

41%

31%

76%

86%

42%

18. Remove guidewire

4%

45%

43%

76%

82%

25%

19. Flush ports

0%

5%

5%

28%

27%

 − 4%

20. Secure and dress catheter

11%

41%

34%

80%

82%

10%

21. Order chest X-ray

22%

41%

24%

84%

86%

13%

  1. If treatment > control, “treatment improvement (% of possible)” = (treatment — control)/(100% — control). If treatment < control, “treatment decrement (% of possible)” = (treatment — control)/(control)