Li C, Lalani F. The COVID-19 pandemic has changed education forever. This is how. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/coronavirus-education-global-covid19-online-digital-learning/. Accessed 1 June, 2020.
Mukhopadhyay S, Booth AL, Calkins SM, Doxtader EE, Fine SW, Gardner JM, et al. Leveraging technology for remote learning in the era of COVID-19 and social distancing: tips and resources for pathology educators and trainees. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2020-0201-ED.
Schneider SL, Council ML. Distance learning in the era of COVID-19. Arch Dermatol res. 2020. May 8:1-2.4. Mian a, khan S. medical education during pandemics: a UK perspective. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):100.
Drake N, Turner B. Best videoconferencing sortware in 2020. https://www.techradar.com/best/best-video-conferencing-software. Accessed 1 June, 2020.
McCoy CE, Sayegh J, Alrabah R, Yarris LM. Telesimulation: an innovative tool for health professions education. AEM Educ Train. 2017;1(2):132–6.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Donohue LT, Hoffman KR, Marcin JP. Use of telemedicine to improve neonatal resuscitation. Children (Basel). 2019;6(4):50.
Google Scholar
Abraham P, Verdonk F, Buleon C, Tesniere A, Lilot M. Implementation of a novel synchronous multi-site all day high-fidelity simulation. Adv Simul (Lond), 2018. 3:2.
Ohta K, Kurosawa H, Shiima Y, Ikeyama T, Scott J, Hayes S, et al. The effectiveness of remote facilitation in simulation-based pediatric resuscitation training for medical students. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017;33:564–9.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ikeyama T, Shimizu N, Ohta K. Low-cost and ready-to-go remote-facilitated simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc. 2012;7(1):35–9.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gisondi MA. Teaching remotely in response to COVID-19: 10 tips to improve your digital classroom 2020. https://icenetblog.royalcollege.ca/2020/03/17/teaching-remotely-in-response-to-covid-19-10-tips-to-improve-your-digital-classroom/. Accessed 1 June, 2020.
Verkuyl M, Atack L, McCulloch T, Liu L, Betts L, Lapum JL, et al. Comparison of debriefing methods after a virtual simulation: an experiment. Clin Simul Nurs. 2018;19:1–7.
Google Scholar
Verkuyl M, Lapum JL, Hughes M, McCulloch T, Liu L, Mastrilli P, et al. Virtual gaming simulation: exploring self-debriefing, virtual debriefing, and in-person debriefing. Clin Simul Nurs. 2018;20:7–14.
Google Scholar
Gordon RM. Debriefing virtual simulation using an online conferencing platform: lessons learned. Clin Simul Nurs. 2017;13(12):668–74.
Google Scholar
Ahmed R, King Gardner A, Atkinson SS, Gable B. Teledebriefing: connecting learners to faculty members. Clin Teach. 2014;11(4):270–3.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bordage G. Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Med Educ. 2009;43(4):312–9.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded source book. 2nd edition ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publishers; 1994.
Google Scholar
Shea P, Li CS, Pickett A. A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. Internet High Educ. 2006;9(3):175–90.
Google Scholar
Garrison DR, Arbaugh JB. Researching the community of inquiry framework: review, issues, and future directions. Internet High Educ. 2007;10(3):157–72.
Google Scholar
Aylwin C. Faculty and student interaction in an online master’s course: survey and content analysis. JMIR Med Educ. 2019;5(1):e10464.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Fiock HS. Designing a community of inquiry in online courses. Int Rev Res Open Distribut Learn. 2020;21(1):135–53.
Google Scholar
Lowenthal PR, Dunlap JC. Investigating students’ perception of instructional strategies to establish social presence. Distance Educ. 2018;39(3):281–98.
Google Scholar
Seckman C. Impact of interactive video communiation versus text-based feedback on teaching, social and cognitive presence in online learning communities. Nurse Educ. 2018;43(1):18–22.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Garrison DR, Anderson T, Archer W. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. Internet High Educ. 2000;2(2–3):87–105.
Google Scholar
Cheng A, Morse KJ, Rudolph J, Arab AA, Runnacles J, Eppich W. Learner-centered debriefing for health care simulation education: lessons for faculty development. Simul Healthc. 2016;11(1):32–40.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tolu AT. Creating effective communities of inquiry in online courses. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2013;70:1049–55.
Google Scholar
Tu C-H. On-line learning migration: from social learning theory to social presence theory in a CMC environment. J Netw Comput Appl. 2000;23(1):27–37.
Google Scholar
Kolbe M, Eppich W, Rudolph J, Meguerdichian M, Catena H, Cripps A, et al. Managing psychological safety in debriefings: a dynamic balancing act. BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning. 2019:bmjstel-2019-000470.
Edmondson AC, Lei Z. Psychological safety: the history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Ann Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2014;1(1):23–43.
Google Scholar
Akyol Z, Garrison DR. The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. J Asynchr Learn Net. 2008;12(3–4):3–22.
Google Scholar
Tu C-H, McIsaac M. The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. Am J Dist Educ. 2002;16(3):131–50.
Google Scholar
Walther JB. Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Commun Res. 1996;23(1):3–43.
Google Scholar
Rogers P, Lea M. Social presence in distributed group environments: the role of social identity. Behav Inform Technol. 2005;24(2):151–8.
Google Scholar
Kreijins K, Kirschner PA, Jochems W. Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Comput Hum Behav. 2003;19(3):335–53.
Google Scholar
Grant VJ, Robinson T, Catena H, Eppich W, Cheng A. Difficult debriefing situations: a toolbox for simulation educators. Med Teach. 2018:1–10.
Hove MJ, Risen JL. It’s all in the timing: interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Soc Cogn. 2009;27(6):949–60.
Google Scholar
Clark HH, Brennan SE. Grounding in communication. In: Resnick LB, Levin JM, Teasley SD, editors. Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1991.
Google Scholar
Olson J, Olson G, Meader D. What mix of video and audio is useful for doing remote real-time design work? Proc Human Comput Interac Conf. 1995:362–8.
d'Alessio MA, Lundquist LL, Schwart JJ, Pedone V, Pavia J, Fleck J. Social presence enhances student performance in an online geology course but depends on instructor facilitation. J Geosci Educ. 2019;67(3):222–36.
Google Scholar
Cui G, Lockee B, Meng C. Building modern online social presence: a review of social presence theory and its instructional design implications for future trends. Educ Inf Technol. 2013;18(4):661–85.
Google Scholar
Edmondson A. Teaming: how organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy: Jossey-bass; 2012.
Google Scholar
Cheng A, Palaganas J, Eppich W, Rudolph J, Robinson T, Grant V. Co-debriefing for simulation-based education a primer for facilitators. Simul Healthc. 2015;10(2):69–75.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Nembhard IM, Edmondson AC. Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J Organ Behav. 2006;27(7):941–66.
Google Scholar
Cornelius C, Boos M. Enhancing mutual understanding in synchronous computer-mediated communication by training:trade-offs in judgmental tasks. Commun Res. 2003;30(2):147–77.
Google Scholar
Sawyer T, Eppich W, Brett-Fleegler M, Grant V, Cheng A. More than one way to debrief a critical review of healthcare simulation debriefing methods. Simul Healthc. 2016;11(3):209–17.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Eppich W, Cheng A. Promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation (PEARLS): development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing. Simul Healthc. 2015;10(2):106–15.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB. There’s no such thing as “nonjudgmental” debriefing: a theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthc. 2006;1(1):49–55.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kolbe M, Weiss M, Grote G, Knauth A, Dambach M, Spahn DR, et al. TeamGAINS: a tool for structured debriefings for simulation-based team trainings. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(7):541–53.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zigmont JJ, Kappus LJ, Sudikoff SN. The 3D model of debriefing: defusing, discovering, and deepening. Semin Perinatol. 2011;35(2):52–8.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jaye P, Thomas L, Reedy G. ‘The diamond’: a structure for simulation debrief. Clin Teach. 2015;12:171–5.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Phrampus P, O’Donnell J. Debriefing using a structrued and supported approach. In: Levine AI, DeMaria S, Schwartz AD, Jim AJ, editors. The comprehensive textbook of healthcare simulation. New York, New York: Springer; 2013. p. 73–84.
Google Scholar
Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):101–8.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rudolph JW, Simon R, Raemer DB, Eppich WJ. Debriefing as formative assessment: closing performance gaps in medical education. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(11):1010–6.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kolbe M, Marty A, Seelandt J, Grande B. How to debrief teamwork interactions: using circular questions to explore and change team interaction patterns. Adv Simul. 2016;(1):1, 29.
Cheng A, Grant V, Robinson T, Catena H, Lachapelle K, Kim J, et al. The promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation (PEARLS) approach to health care debriefing: a faculty development guide. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2016;12(10):419–28.
Google Scholar
Evans S, Knight T, Sonderlund A, Tooley G. Facilitators’ experience of delivering asynchronous and synchronous online interprofessional education. Med Teach. 2014;36(12):1051–6.
PubMed
Google Scholar
O'Doherty D, Dromey M, Lougheed J, Hannigan A, Last J, McGrath D. Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education - an integrative review. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):130.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ellaway R, Masters K. AMEE guide 32: e-learning in medical education part 1: learning, teaching and assessment. Med Teach. 2008;30(5):455–73.
PubMed
Google Scholar
UKEssays. Definitions Of Mental Workload Psychology Essay 2018. https://www.ukessays.com/essays/psychology/definitions-of-mental-workload-psychology-essay.php?vref=1. Accessed 1 June, 2020.
Fraser KL, Meguerdichian MJ, Haws JT, Grant VJ, Bajaj K, Cheng A. Cognitive load theory for debriefing simulations: implications for faculty development. Adv Simul (Lond). 2018;3:28. Pg 2.
Brower KJ. Faculty development curriculum to facilitate discourse in the online space: University of Southern California; 2017.
Google Scholar
Bajaj K, Meguerdichian M, Thoma B, Huang S, Eppich W, Cheng A. The PEARLS healthcare debriefing tool. Acad Med. 2018;93(2):336.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Regmi K, Jones L. A systematic review of the factors - enablers and barriers - affecting e-learning in health sciences education. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):91.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Chen R. Learner perspectives of online problem-based learning and applications from cognitive load theory. Psychol Learn Teach. 2016;15(2):195–203.
Google Scholar
de Oliveira Neto JD, Huang WD, de Azevedo Melli NC. Online learning: audio or text? Educ Technol Res Dev. 2015;63:555–73.
Google Scholar