Mullan PC, Kessler DO, Cheng A. Educational opportunities with postevent debriefing. JAMA. 2014;312(22):2333–4.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hicks CW, Rosen M, Hobson DB, et al. Improving safety and quality of care with enhanced teamwork through operating room briefings. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(8):863–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cheng A, Eppich W, Grant V, et al. Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ. 2014;48:657–66.
Mullan PC, Cochrane NH, Chamberlain JM, et al. Accuracy of postresuscitation team debriefings in a pediatric emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;70(3):311–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rudolph JW, Simon R, Rivard P, et al. Debriefing with good judgment: combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry. Anesthesiol Clin. 2007;25:361–76.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc. 2007;2:115–25.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Salas E, Klein C, King H, et al. Debriefing medical teams: 12 evidence-based best practices and tips. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34:518–27.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Eddy ER, Tannenbaum SI, Mathieu JE. Helping teams to help themselves: comparing two team-led debriefing methods. Pers Psychol. 2013;66:975–1008.
Article
Google Scholar
Dieckmann P, Molin Friis S, Lippert A, et al. The art and science of debriefing in simulation: ideal and practice. Med Teach. 2009;31:e287–e94.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tavares W, Eppich W, Cheng A, et al. Learning conversations: an analysis of the theoretical roots and their manifestations of feedback and debriefing in medical education. Acad Med. 2020;95(7):1020–5.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Keiser NL, Arthur W. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the after-action review (or debrief) and factors that influence its effectiveness. J Appl Psychol. 2020.
World Health Organization. The global practice of after action review: a systematic review of literature. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. 2019. Contract No.: WHO/WHE/CPI/2019.9
Google Scholar
Arnold J, Cashin M, Olutoye OO. Simulation-based clinical rehearsals as a method for improving patient safety. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(12):1143–4.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Vashdi DR, Bamberger PA, Erez M. Can surgical teams ever learn? The role of coordination, complexity, and transitivity in action team learning. Acad Manage J. 2013;56:945–71.
Article
Google Scholar
Schmutz JB, Eppich WJ. Promoting learning and patient care through shared reflection: a conceptual framework for team reflexivity in health care. Acad Med. 2017;92(11):1555–63.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Dieckmann P, Torgeirsen K, Qvindesland SA, et al. The use of simulation to prepare and improve responses to infectious disease outbreaks like COVID-19: practical tips and resources from Norway, Denmark, and the UK. Adv Simul (Lond). 2020;5:3.
Article
Google Scholar
Tannenbaum SI, Traylor AM, Thomas EJ, et al. Managing teamwork in the face of pandemic: evidence-based tips. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020.
Weiss M, Kolbe M, Grote G, et al. Why didn’t you say something? Using after-event reviews to affect voice behavior and hierarchy beliefs in multi-professional action teams. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2017;26(1):66–80.
Article
Google Scholar
Smith-Jentsch KA, Cannon-Bowers JA, Tannenbaum S, et al. Guided team self-correction: impacts on team mental models, processes, and effectiveness. Small Group Res. 2008;39:303–29.
Article
Google Scholar
Tannenbaum SI, Cerasoli CP. Do team and individual debriefs enhance performance? A meta-analysis. Hum Factors. 2013;55(1):231–45.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tannenbaum SI, Goldhaber-Fiebert S. Medical team debriefs: simple, powerful, underutilized. In: Salas E, Frush K, editors. Improving patient safety through teamwork and team training. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 249–56.
Google Scholar
Sandhu N, Eppich W, Mikrogianakis A, et al. Postresuscitation debriefing in the pediatric emergency department: a national needs assessment. Can J Emerg Med. 2014;16(5):383–92.
Article
Google Scholar
Ahmed M, Sevdalis N, Paige J, et al. Identifying best practice guidelines for debriefing in surgery: a tri-continental study. Am J Surg. 2012;203:523–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Arriaga AF, Sweeney RE, Clapp JT, et al. Failure to debrief after critical events in anesthesia is associated with failures in communication during the event. Anesthesiology. 2019;130(6):1039–48.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cheng A, Eppich W, Kolbe M, et al. A conceptual framework for the development of debriefing skills: a journey of discovery, growth, and maturity. Simul Healthcare. 2020;15(1):55–60.
Article
Google Scholar
Rudolph JW, Foldy EG, Robinson T, et al. Helping without harming. The instructor's feedback dilemma in debriefing--a case study. Simul Healthc. 2013;8:304–16.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kolbe M, Rudolph JW. What’s the headline on your mind right now? How reflection guides simulation-based faculty development in a master class. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanced Learn. 2018;4(3):126–32.
Article
Google Scholar
Fraser KL, Meguerdichian MJ, Haws JT, et al. Cognitive load theory for debriefing simulations: implications for faculty development. Adv Simul. 2018;3(1):28.
Article
Google Scholar
Sweeney RE, Clapp JT, Arriaga AF, et al. Understanding debriefing: a qualitative study of event reconstruction at an academic medical center. Acad Med. 2020;95(7):1089–97.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Eppich W, Cheng A. Promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation (PEARLS): development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing. Simul Healthc. 2015;10.
Jaye P, Thomas L, Reedy G. ‘The Diamond’: a structure for simulation debrief. Clin Teach. 2015;12(3):171–5.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Rose S, Cheng A. Charge nurse facilitated clinical debriefing in the emergency department. CJEM. 2018;20(5):781–5.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kessler DO, Cheng A, Mullan PC. Debriefing in the emergency department after clinical events: a practical guide. Ann Emerg Med. 2015;65(6):690–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kolbe M, Weiss M, Grote G, et al. TeamGAINS: a tool for structured debriefings for simulation-based team trainings. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:541–53.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mullan PC, Wuestner E, Kerr TD, et al. Implementation of an in situ qualitative debriefing tool for resuscitations. Resuscitation. 2013;84(7):946–51.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Chinnock B, Mullan PC, Zinns LE, et al. Debriefing: an expert panel's how-to guide. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;70(3):320–2.e1.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zinns LE, Mullan PC, O'Connell KJ, et al. An evaluation of a new debriefing framework: REFLECT. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020;36(3).
Sawyer T, Eppich W, Brett-Fleegler M, et al. More than one way to debrief: a critical review of healthcare simulation debriefing methods. Simul Healthc. 2016;11.
Gougoulis A, Trawber R, Hird K, et al. ‘Take 10 to talk about it’: use of a scripted, post-event debriefing tool in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Paediatr Child Health. 2020;Advanced online publication.
Rudolph JW, Raemer DB, Simon R. Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation: the role of the pre-simulation briefing. Simul Healthc. 2014;9(6):339–49.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kolbe M, Eppich W, Rudolph J, et al. Managing psychological safety in debriefings: a dynamic balancing act. BMJ STEL. 2020;6(3):164–71.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Cheng A, Palaganas J, Eppich W, et al. Co-debriefing for simulation-based education: a primer for facilitators. Simul Healthcare. 2015;10(2):69–75.
Article
Google Scholar
Grant VJ, Robinson T, Catena H, et al. Difficult debriefing situations: a toolbox for simulation educators. Med Teach. 2018:1–10.
Kolbe M, Marty A, Seelandt J, et al. How to debrief teamwork interactions: using circular questions to explore and change team interaction patterns. Adv Simul. 2016;1(1):29.
Article
Google Scholar
Welch-Horan TB, Lemke DS, Bastero P, et al. Feedback, reflection and team learning for COVID-19: development of a novel clinical event debriefing tool. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanced Learn. 2020:bmjstel-2020-000638.
Cheng A, Kolbe M, Grant V, et al. A practical guide to virtual debriefings: communities of inquiry perspective. Adv Simul. 2020;5(1):18.
Article
Google Scholar
Bajaj K, Minors A, Walker K, et al. “No-go considerations” for in situ simulation safety. Simul Healthc. 2018;13(3):221–4.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Detert JR, Edmondson A. Implicit voice theories: taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Acad Manage J. 2011;54(3):461–88.
Article
Google Scholar
Levy SR, C-y C, Y-y H. Lay theories and intergroup relations. Group Processes Intergroup Relat. 2006;9(1):5–24.
Article
Google Scholar
Putnam LL, Fairhurst GT, Banghart S. Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: a constitutive approach. Acad Manage Ann. 2016;10(1):65–171.
Article
Google Scholar
von Schlippe A, Schweitzer J. Lehrbuch der systemischen Therapie und Beratung [textbook of systemic therapy and counselling]. 10. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht; 2007.
Diorinou M, Tseliou E. Studying circular questioning “in situ”: discourse analysis of a first systemic family therapy session. J Marital Fam Ther. 2014;40(1):106–21.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Penn P. Circular questioning. Fam Process. 1982;21(3):267–80.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Simon FB, Rech-Simon C. Zirkuläres Fragen. Systemische Therapie in Fallbeispielen: Ein Lehrbuch. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer; 2007.
Google Scholar
Tomm K. Interventive interviewing: part 111. Intending to ask lineal, circular, strategic, or reflexive questions? Fam Process. 1988;27:1–15.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kriz WC. A systemic-constructivist approach to the facilitation and debriefing of simulations and games. Simul Gaming. 2010;41:663–80.
Article
Google Scholar
Palazzoli Selvini M, Boscolo L, Cecchin G, et al. Hypothesizing--circularity--neutrality: three guidelines for the conductor of the session. Fam Process. 1980;19(1):3–12.
Article
Google Scholar
Vashdi DR, Bamberger PA, Erez M, et al. Briefing-debriefing: using a reflexive organizational learning model from the military to enhance the performance of surgical teams. Hum Resour Manag. 2007;46(1):115–42.
Servotte J-C, Welch-Horan TB, Mullan P, et al. Development and implementation of an end-of-shift clinical debriefing method for emergency departments during COVID-19. Adv Simul (Lond). 2020;5(1):32.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Allen JA, Reiter-Palmon R, Crowe J, et al. Debriefs: teams learning from doing in context. Am Psychol. 2018;73:504–16.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Shalev A, Liberzon I, Marmar C. Post-traumatic stress disorder. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(25):2459–69.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rose S, Bisson J, Churchill R, et al. Psychological debriefing for preventing post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(2):Cd000560.
Cheng A, Grant V, Dieckmann P, et al. Faculty development for simulation programs: five issues for the future of debriefing training. Simul Healthc. 2015;10(4):217–22.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cheng A, Morse KJ, Rudolph J, et al. Learner-centered debriefing for health care simulation education: lessons for faculty development. Simul Healthc. 2016;11(1):32–40.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cheng A, Grant V, Huffman J, et al. Coaching the debriefer: peer coaching to improve debriefing quality in simulation programs. Simul Healthcare. 2017;12(5):319–25.
Article
Google Scholar
Stone D, Patton B, Heen S. Difficult conversations. New York: Penguin Books; 1999.
Google Scholar
Argyris C. Making the undiscussable and its undiscussability discussable. Public Administrative Review. 1980;40:205–13.
Argyris C, Putnam R, McLain SD. Action science: concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1985.
Google Scholar
Edmondson AC, Lei Z. Psychological safety: the history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2014;1(1):23–43.
Article
Google Scholar
Argyris C. Double-loop learning, teaching, and research. Acad Manag Learn Edu. 2002;1:206–18.
Hull L, Russ S, Ahmed M, et al. Quality of interdisciplinary postsimulation debriefing: 360° evaluation. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanced Learn. 2017;3(1):9–16.
Article
Google Scholar
Eppich W, Mullan PC, Brett-Fleegler M, et al. “Let’s talk about it”: translating lessons from healthcare simulation to clinical event debriefings and clinical coaching conversations. Clin Pediatr Emerg Med. 2016;177:200–11.
Sawyer T, Loren D, Halamek LP. Post-event debriefings during neonatal care: why are we not doing them, and how can we start[quest]. J Perinatol. 2016;36(6):415–9.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kolbe M, Grande B, Spahn DR. Briefing and debriefing during simulation-based training and beyond: content, structure, attitude, and setting. Best Pract Res. 2015;29(1):87–96.
Google Scholar
Eppich WJ, Hunt EA, Duval-Arnould JM, et al. Structuring feedback and debriefing to achieve mastery learning goals. Acad Med. 2015;90:1501–8.
Strong T, Pyle NR, Sutherland O. Scaling questions: asking and answering them in counselling. Couns Psychol Q. 2009;22(2):171–85.
Article
Google Scholar
von Ameln F, Kramer J. Skalierungsfragen und Aktionssoziometrie. In: von Ameln F, Kramer J, editors. Organisationen in Bewegung bringen: Handlungsorientierte Methoden für die Personal-, Team- und Organisationsentwicklung. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2016. p. 109–20.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Seelandt JC. Quality Control. In: Brauner E, Boos M, Kolbe M, editors. The Cambridge handbook of group interaction analysis. Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2018. p. 227–44.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observers agreement for categorial data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
Article
Google Scholar
Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science. 1974;185(4157):1124–31.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm Sci Q. 1999;44:350–83.
Article
Google Scholar
Schein EH. How can organizations learn faster? The challenge of entering the green room. Sloan Manage Rev. 1993;34:85–92.
Google Scholar
Pian-Smith MCM, Cooper JB. If we don’t learn from our critical events, we’re likely to relive them: debriefing should be the norm. Anesthesiology. 2019;130(6):867–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Finkenauer C, et al. Bad is stronger than good. Rev Gen Psychol. 2001;5(4):323–70.
Article
Google Scholar
Hollnagel E. Safety-I and Safety-II. The past and future of safety management. Farnham: Ashgate; 2014.
Google Scholar
Marks MA, Mathieu JE, Zaccaro SJ. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Acad Manage Rev. 2001;26:356–76.
Article
Google Scholar
Gurtner A, Tschan F, Semmer N-K, et al. Getting groups to develop good strategies: effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and shared mental models. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2007;102:127–42.
Article
Google Scholar
Hackman JR, Wageman R. A theory of team coaching. Acad Manage Rev. 2005;30:269–87.
Article
Google Scholar
Engelmann C, Schneider M, Kirschbaum C, et al. Effects of intraoperative breaks on mental and somatic operator fatigue: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1245–50.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lingard L, Regehr G, Cartmill C, et al. Evaluation of a preoperative team briefing: a new communication routine results in improved clinical practice. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(6):475–82.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Arriaga AF, Bader AM, Wong JM, et al. Simulation-based trial of surgical-crisis checklists. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:246–53.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Davies Joanna M, Posner Karen L, Lee Lorri A, et al. Liability associated with obstetric anesthesia: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 2009;110(1):131–9.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Arriaga AF, Gawande AA, Raemer DB, et al. Pilot testing of a model for insurer-driven, large-scale multicenter simulation training for operating room teams. Ann Surg. 2014;259(3):403–10.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
DiazGranados D, Dow AW, Perry SJ, et al. Understanding patient care as a multiteam system In: Shuffler ML, Rico R, Salas E, editors. Pushing the boundaries: Multiteam systems in research and practice: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2014. p. 95-113.
Taplin SH, Weaver S, Salas E, et al. Reviewing cancer care team effectiveness. J Oncol Pract. 2015;11(3):239–46.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Head SJ, Kaul S, Mack MJ, et al. The rationale for Heart Team decision-making for patients with stable, complex coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(32):2510–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pronovost P. Teamwork matters. In: Salas E, Tannenbaum SI, Cohen D, Latham G, editors. Developing and enhancing teamwork in organizations: Evidence-based best practices and guidelines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2013. p. 11–2.
Google Scholar
Raemer DB, Kolbe M, Minehart RD, et al. Improving anesthesiologists’ ability to speak up in the operating room: a randomized controlled experiment of a simulation-based intervention and a qualitative analysis of hurdles and enablers. Acad Med. 2016;91(4):530–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pattni N, Arzola C, Malavade A, et al. Challenging authority and speaking up in the operating room environment: a narrative synthesis. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122(2):233–44.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Schwappach D, Gehring K. Trade-offs between voice and silence: a qualitative exploration of oncology staff's decisions to speak up about safety concerns. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):303.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Schwappach D, Richard A. Speak up-related climate and its association with healthcare workers’ speaking up and withholding voice behaviours: a cross-sectional survey in Switzerland. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27(10):827–35.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Schwappach DLB, Gehring K. Frequency of and predictors for withholding patient safety concerns among oncology staff: a survey study. Eur J Cancer Care. 2015;24(3):395–403.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Okuyama A, Wagner C, Bijnen B. Speaking up for patient safety by hospital-based health care professionals: a literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:61–9.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Bell SK, Roche SD, Mueller A, et al. Speaking up about care concerns in the ICU: patient and family experiences, attitudes and perceived barriers. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27(11):928–36.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Detert JR, Burris ER. Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Acad Manage J. 2007;50:869–84.
Article
Google Scholar
Kish-Gephart JJ, Detert JR, Treviño LK, et al. Silenced by fear: the nature, sources, and consequences of fear at work. Res Organ Behav. 2009;29:163–93.
Google Scholar
Tangirala S, Kamdar D, Venkataramani V, et al. Doing right versus getting ahead: the effects of duty and achievement orientations on employees’ voice. J Appl Psychol. 2013;98(6):1040–50.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Beament T, Mercer S. Speak up! Barriers to challenging erroneous decisions of seniors in anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(11):1332–40.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kobayashi H, Pian-Smith M, Sato M, et al. A cross-cultural survey of residents’ perceived barriers in questioning/challenging authority. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:277–83.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Pattni N, Bould MD, Hayter MA, et al. Gender, power and leadership: the effect of a superior's gender on respiratory therapists’ ability to challenge leadership during a life-threatening emergency. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(4):697–702.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Garden AL, Weller JM. Speaking up: Does anaesthetist gender influence teamwork and collaboration? Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(4):571–2.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Green B, Oeppen R, Smith D, et al. Challenging hierarchy in healthcare teams–ways to flatten gradients to improve teamwork and patient care. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;55(5):449–53.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Edrees HH, Ismail MNM, Kelly B, et al. Examining influences on speaking up among critical care healthcare providers in the United Arab Emirates. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2017;29(7):948–60.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hale SJ, Parker MJ, Cupido C, et al. Applications of postresuscitation debriefing frameworks in emergency settings: a systematic review. AEM Educ Train. 2020;4(3):223–30.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Scott K. Radical candor: how to be a kick ass boss without losing your humanity. New York: St. Martins Press; 2017.
Google Scholar
Stasser G, Titus W. Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: biased information sampling during discussion. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985;48:1467–578.
Article
Google Scholar
Kerr NL, Tindale RS. Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology. 2004;55(1):623–55.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Larson JRJ, Foster-Fishman PG, Franz TM. Leadership style and the discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1998;24:482–95.
Article
Google Scholar
Mesmer-Magnus JR, DeChurch LA. Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94:535–46.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mojzisch A, Schulz-Hardt S. Knowing others’ preferences degrades the quality of group decisions. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010;98(5):794–808.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Stewart DD, Stasser G. Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;69(4):619–28.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne RL, et al. There's no such thing as “nonjudgmental” debriefing: a theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthc. 2006;1(1):49–55.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rudolph JW, Simon FB, Raemer DB, et al. Debriefing as formative assessment: closing performance gaps in medical education. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:1010–6.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Peterson DT, Watts PI, Epps CA, et al. Simulation faculty development: a tiered approach. Simulation in Healthcare. 2017;12(4):254–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rock LK, Rudolph JW, Fey MK, et al. “Circle Up”: workflow adaptation and psychological support via briefing, debriefing, and peer support. NEJM Catalyst. 2020;Online first.