Skip to main content
  • Methodological intersections
  • Open access
  • Published:

Measuring cognitively demanding activities in pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest



This methodological intersection article demonstrates a method to measure cognitive load in clinical simulations. Researchers have hypothesized that high levels of cognitive load reduce performance and increase errors. This phenomenon has been studied primarily by experimental designs that measure responses to predetermined stimuli and self-reports that reduce the experience to a summative value. Our goal was to develop a method to identify clinical activities with high cognitive burden using physiologic measures.


Teams of emergency medical responders were recruited from local fire departments to participate in a scenario with a shockable pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (POHCA) patient. The scenario was standardized with the patient being resuscitated after receiving high-quality CPR and 3 defibrillations. Each team had a person in charge (PIC) who wore a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) device that recorded changes in oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin concentration in their prefrontal cortex (PFC), which was interpreted as cognitive activity.

We developed a data processing pipeline to remove nonneural noise (e.g., motion artifacts, heart rate, respiration, and blood pressure) and detect statistically significant changes in cognitive activity. Two researchers independently watched videos and coded clinical tasks corresponding to detected events. Disagreements were resolved through consensus, and results were validated by clinicians.


We conducted 18 simulations with 122 participants. Participants arrived in teams of 4 to 7 members, including one PIC. We recorded the PIC’s fNIRS signals and identified 173 events associated with increased cognitive activity. [Defibrillation] (N = 34); [medication] dosing (N = 33); and [rhythm checks] (N = 28) coincided most frequently with detected elevations in cognitive activity. [Defibrillations] had affinity with the right PFC, while [medication] dosing and [rhythm checks] had affinity with the left PFC.


FNIRS is a promising tool for physiologically measuring cognitive load. We describe a novel approach to scan the signal for statistically significant events with no a priori assumptions of when they occur. The events corresponded to key resuscitation tasks and appeared to be specific to the type of task based on activated regions in the PFC. Identifying and understanding the clinical tasks that require high cognitive load can suggest targets for interventions to decrease cognitive load and errors in care.


Cognitive errors have been implicated in causing adverse safety events that harm patients [1]. Researchers have used different methods to study cognition, with the goal of improving safety [2]. The NASA Task Load Index [3] (NASA-TLX) is a prevalent method in which subjects rate their perceived load when performing tasks. The results are easy to interpret and summarize the overall experience. Physiological measures, like heart rate, pupillary dilation, and skin conductivity, can also measure cognitive load as the body’s response to a task [4]. These methods are indirect and require more effort to interpret.

Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has emerged as a physiological method to directly measure cognitive activity. An fNIRS device is worn as headgear with embedded light sources and detectors. The light sources project near-infrared light into the cranial tissues, and the detectors measure changes in oxygen concentration based on the amount of light absorbed. Higher levels of oxygen correspond to higher levels of cognitive activity. This method has distinct advantages in that it can directly and continuously measure cognitive activity in naturalistic settings. Pinti and colleagues provide an overview of the many applications of fNIRS [5]. fNIRS has historically been studied in controlled experimental designs to measure cognitive response to predetermined stimuli [6]. In these designs, subjects undergo exposure to a predetermined stimulus that is expected to evoke a hemodynamic response such as a pedestrian appearing in front of a driver. Pinti, Merla, and Aichelburg recently proposed a data-driven method to scan for functional events without prior knowledge of the stimuli [7]. This approach iteratively fits segments of fNIRS signals to the canonical hemodynamic response function (HRF) [8, 9]. Statistically significant matches are labeled as responses to unknown stimuli. This method could be useful in detecting events that increase cognitive load in dynamic clinical simulations.

The objective of this study was to explore the acquisition, cleaning, and interpretation of fNIRS data in simulated clinical scenarios to identify clinical events with high cognitive load. Identifying events associated with high cognitive load could improve understanding of threats to safety in critical situations, such as pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (POHCA).


We conducted a cross-sectional observational study to characterize the cognitive activity of emergency medical services (EMS) providers during a simulation-based activity. Teams of paramedics and emergency medical technicians (EMTs) were recruited from local fire departments to participate in a simulated POHCA scenario. EMS teams were recruited in “engine companies” or fixed teams who typically work together based on the availability on the day of the simulation. Voluntary informed consent for participation, media release, and confidentially were obtained from participants. Each team had a person in charge (PIC) who were trained paramedics and wore the fNIRS device during the scenario. Teams underwent an orientation where they were able to familiarize themselves with the patient simulator (SimJunior® by Laerdal) and the simulated monitor (iSimulate, Albany, NY, USA) that were used in the scenario. We also surveyed the paramedics for their level of experience.

The simulations were conducted at training centers close to the participants. The setup and session facilitation were standardized. Each scenario started with a patient simulator lying supine on the floor, an iSimulate patient monitor nearby, an overhead GoPro, trained actor, and room dividers to minimize distractions. The actor portrayed a distraught family member performing CPR on the patient. The actor followed a script telling responders that the patient has developmental issues became unresponsive a few minutes ago. Clinical investigators stood behind screens to make observations and troubleshoot technical difficulties. The participants were instructed that no interaction would happen with the investigators unless there was a technical failure. For consistency, all scenarios were concluded at 10 min. Teams used their own equipment and responded to the simulations as they normally would during patient care.


Teams were dispatched to a 6-year-old boy who had passed out twice in the past week. The patient presented as not breathing, unresponsive, and started with a shockable rhythm. The teams were expected to perform high-quality CPR, defibrillation every 3 min, administer epinephrine after the second defibrillation, and prepare an antiarrhythmic medication after the third defibrillation according to pediatric advanced life support (PALS) guidelines [10]. The vital signs were programmed to be unchanged for the first two defibrillations and become normal after the third defibrillation.

FNIRS device and configuration

Optical measurements were captured using a continuous wave functional near-infrared spectrometer (OctaMon, Artinis Medical Systems, The Netherlands). OctaMon is a wireless headband with eight optodes, or bundles of optical fiber, light transmitters, and receivers. The transmitters project near-infrared light through cranial tissues at wavelengths of 759 nm and 841 nm. The receivers measure how much light is absorbed at a frequency of 50 Hz. The optical density, or change in absorbed light, was converted to changes in deoxygenated (HbR) and oxygenated (HbO) hemoglobin concentration by the modified Beer-Lambert law.

Figure 1 illustrates that the optodes were placed in a configuration of 3 × 2 long and 1 × 2 short channels over the prefrontal cortex (PFC), where channels correspond to a transmitter and receiver pair. The distance between transmitters and receivers was 35 mm in long channels and 10 mm in short channels. The long channels recorded neural and nonneural signals, e.g., heart rate, respiration, and blood pressure. The short channels recorded nonneural signals such that they could be filtered from the long channels [11].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Optode layout of 3 transmitters × 2 receivers for long channels and 1 transmitter × 2 receivers for short channels

Data processing pipeline

The objective of an fNIRS analysis is to measure task-evoked hemodynamic responses. We established a data processing pipeline, summarized in Fig. 2, to determine signal quality, filter nonneural signal, and identify cognitive events. The data processing pipeline was implemented in Python 3.8 and used the Pandas 1.4.2, Numpy 1.21.5, Scipy 1.7.3, Scikit-learn 1.0.2, and Nilearn 0.7.1 libraries for numerical processing [12,13,14,15,16]. After processing, two researchers (N. B. and J. I.) mapped functional events to videos and coded clinical activities.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The data processing pipeline

Signal quality

We used the signal quality index (SQI) to rate our data [17]. The SQI determined if light measured by the device fell within acceptable ranges and rated quality based on the clarity of the heartbeat in the signal. The SQI was applied in 10-s windows to identify low-quality segments, channels, and samples. We used a wavelet filter [18] to correct for motion artifacts in the segments and excluded low-quality channels and samples from subsequent analysis.

Filtering nonneural signals

After evaluating signal quality, we used recursive least-squares (RLS) adaptive filter [19] to remove nonneural components from the long channels.


In equation e(k) = d(k) – XT(k)W(k) (1), the filtered signal e(k) is calculated as the difference between the signal from the long channel d(k) and the weighted short channel XT(k)W(k), where k is an index at a given time point and X(k) is an nth-order vector X(k) = [x(k) x(k-1) … x(k-N)]. Weights were applied because light travels a different distance in short channels than long channels, and this affects its intensity. The weights were updated based on a least-squares error criterion and included a forget factor, set to 0.9999, which limited influence of information from the distant past. The order allowed the filter to adapt to nonstationary changes and was set to 16.

Identification of cognitive events

After removing the noise, we applied the Automatic IDentification of functional Events (AIDE) algorithm [7] as an exploratory method to identify clinical events associated with increased cognitive activity. The algorithm tries to fit the HRF [8, 9] for different start times and durations. The HRF, shown in Fig. 3, models cognitive activity as an increase in HbO and decrease in HbR, followed by a reversion back to baseline. It is a mixture of gamma functions with parameters that specify peak delay τp, undershoot delay τd, and amplitude ratio A between peaks. The parameters for HbO were set to 6, 10, and 6, respectively. HbR was set as the inverse of the HbO function with − 1/3 magnitude.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Canonical hemodynamic response function

$$h\left({\tau }_{p},t\right)=\frac{{t}^{{\tau }_{p}}{e}^{-t}}{\left({\tau }_{p}\right)!}- \frac{{t}^{{\tau }_{p}+{\tau }_{d}}{e}^{-t}}{A\left({\tau }_{p}+{\tau }_{d}\right)!}$$

There is an ongoing debate about analyzing the signals separately or combined [20]. HbO has greater signal-to-noise ratio but is more likely to be contaminated with physiological noise. A significant change in both signals potentially provides a more reliable but less sensitive indication of a cognitive event [21]. We applied the AIDE algorithm to HbO and HbR separately and coded events that co-occurred in oxygenated and deoxygenated channels.

We used generalized linear modeling (tools) from Nilearn [22] to compare the HRF to the signal for different times and durations between 10 and 30 s in length. For each time point, the duration with the best t-score and p-value was retained. We used the peak finding algorithm from SciPy [16] to identify locally maximum t-scores that indicated the start of functional events. Events that contained other events were excluded to favor granularity.

Coding of clinical activities

The functional events were mapped to times in the video recordings, as illustrated in Fig. 4. Two researchers (N. B. and J. I.) coded clinical tasks that the PIC performed when functional events were detected in 2 or more oxygenated and deoxygenated channels. The clinical tasks included airway procedures, assessment, circulation, medication dosing and administration, recalling and following protocol, rhythm checks, setup equipment, defibrillating the patient, simulation problems, and unknown events. The criteria to code events with 2 or more active channels were established to minimize false positives.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Coding analysis, add legend describing B and A type figure


We recorded fNIRS signals from 18 simulations at 3 different facilities. There were a total of 122 participants: 18 PICs, 58 paramedic team members, and 46 EMT team members. The PICs led teams with a mean (SD) of 6 (1) members. Table 1 describes the level of experience of the PICs and paramedic team members. PICs and team members reported having similar levels of experience and number of pediatric cardiac arrests treated in the prior year.

Table 1 PIC characteristics. Data are presented as mean (SD)

Table 2 describes the events that were detected and coded. Defibrillation, medication, and rhythm assessment were the most frequent events and considered critical tasks for the POHCA scenario. These events were not evenly distributed across all PICs and could depend on the area of care they focused on or delegated. For example, PICs had more medication events when calculating the dose themselves vs delegating that task to another teammate.

Table 2 Examples and frequency of detected cognitive events

Table 3 shows the frequency of events by channel. The rhythm and medication events appear to have a strong affinity for the left PFC, whereas setup and defibrillation have an affinity for the right PFC. Other events did not exhibit a consistent response in a given hemisphere.

Table 3 Frequency of cognitive events by channel and hemisphere


We used a data-driven method to detect cognitive events that matched critical steps in POHCA resuscitation during dynamic clinical simulations. POHCAs are rare, high-mortality events, [23] and children pose known challenges to care due to their size and physiology [24]. The most frequently detected interventions, [defibrillation], [medication] dosing, and [rhythm] checks, corresponded to times that demanded the PIC’s attention to optimize quality of care. These events also appeared in localized regions of the brain, suggesting some functional dependency.

Our approach differs from previous fNIRS studies, which use a hypothesis-driven methodology to test if specific events exceed a predetermined threshold. Li et al. [25] mixed simulated driving with n-back tasks to validate that fNIRS is sensitive to workload changes in rail transit drivers. Taylor et al. [26] compared healthcare employees’ performance of tasks under varying conditions, e.g., performing a handoff in-person or over video. They concluded that fNIRS was a useful tool in measuring cognitive load, and that load increased with task complexity. This work highlights the potential for fNIRS to enhance future simulation research through objective determination of which aspects of care are associated with higher cognitive load and may be high-yield targets for education or systems improvement.

For data cleaning, different methods have been used to remove nonneural noise from fNIRS signals. Band-pass filters are the most common technique [27] but are only partially effective because the frequencies of some physiological signal overlap with the hemodynamic response [28]. We used an adaptive filter [19] with short-separation channels. Short-distance channels are considered effective for isolating and removing physiological noise [6, 29]. The adaptive aspect of the filter allowed it to compensate for nonstationary nature of the noise, in which light could travel different distances based on changes in the tissue [30]. We also applied a motion-correction wavelet filter [18]. In our initial attempt to code events, we observed that many corresponded to pronounced physical movements, such as kneeling, standing, and lifting equipment. The wavelet filter was effective to exclude these artifacts from analysis.

To detect events, we made adjustments to the AIDE algorithm. First, the length of an event was limited to 10–30 s. The original algorithm allowed events to span 1–300 s. This led to the detection of many small events or a few long events that potentially overlapped. The limit was established as a heuristic to focus on a temporal unit of analysis that fits the activity. A second adjustment was to analyze HbO and HbR separately. The original algorithm combined HbO and HbR into one activation signal [31]. Prior research has found that the signals have different sensitivities to noise, and that detecting concurrent events in both would improve specificity at the cost of sensitivity. We accepted this trade-off because in this dynamic clinical scenario, participants were physically active which increased the likelihood of noise. We coded events that were detected across multiple channels and found that they aligned with our expectations of high-cognitive load events: [defibrillation], [medication] preparation, and [rhythm] analysis corresponded to essential tasks for POHCA care. Medication events, in particular, have been well-documented in the literature as associated with high rates of error based on the need to calculate weight-based dosing [32, 33]. The affinity tasks have with left or right PFC also match mental resources that would be activated. For example, medication-related events were detected more frequently in the left PFC, which is associated with semantic and mathematical problem-solving [34, 35]. Defibrillation events involve monitoring teammates to make sure they are clear of the patient before administering an electrical charge. This event was detected more frequently in the right PFC, which is associated with visual-spatial organization and conflict detection [35, 36]. These findings demonstrate that fNIRS can detect cognitive events of clinical interest and provide insight on the modality of effort.

This work has several limitations. The clinical scenario was created and standardized by expert clinicians, but did not employ all steps described by INACSL as the gold standard for simulation scenario design [37]. Second, this was an observational study that was data driven and exploratory rather than hypothesis driven, and our observed events may contain false positives or false negatives. Finally, while we observed and report on lateralization of task-specific cognitive load, we did not account for PIC handedness which may relate to functional brain mapping [38, 39].

High cognitive load does not necessarily mean that performance will be low or errors will occur. For example, the Yerkes-Dodson curve [40] suggests that there is an optimal load, between disinterest and overburden, at which performance is maximized. This could be explored by comparing cognitive load to errors in simulation and topics discussed in debriefing. These methods and findings could be useful to EMS educators in terms of adjusting the difficulty of training to improve engagement and retention of knowledge.


Detected events in fNIRS signals appeared to coincide with critical tasks in POHCA simulations and have potential for measuring cognitive load in dynamic clinical situations. We used the data-driven algorithm, AIDE, and detected critical tasks that were performed during POHCA care. We also obtained insight on the cognitive demands of these tasks, based on the activated regions of the prefrontal cortex. Future work may involve further refining data cleaning and interpretation through analysis of public data sets and validating our findings across a range of clinical scenarios with the goal of identifying targets to mitigate the impact of cognitive load on clinical practice during high-stake, low-frequency events.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Automatic identification of functional events


Emergency medical services


Emergency medical technician


Functional near-infrared spectroscopy


Oxygenated hemoglobin concentration


Deoxygenated hemoglobin concentration


Hemodynamic response function


Pediatric advanced life support


Prefrontal cortex


Person in charge


Pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest


Recursive least-squares adaptive filter


Signal quality index


  1. Kostopoulou O, Delaney B. Confidential reporting of patient safety events in primary care: results from a multilevel classification of cognitive and system factors. BMJ Qual Saf. 2007;16(2):95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dias RD, Ngo-Howard MC, Boskovski MT, Zenati MA, Yule SJ. Systematic review of measurement tools to assess surgeons’ intraoperative cognitive workload. J Br Surg. 2018;105(5):491–501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hart SG, Staveland LE. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Advances in psychology. Vol 52. Elsevier; 1988. p. 139–83.

  4. Ayres P, Lee JY, Paas F, van Merriënboer JJ. The validity of physiological measures to identify differences in intrinsic cognitive load. Front Psychol. 2021;12.

  5. Pinti P, Tachtsidis I, Hamilton A, et al. The present and future use of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for cognitive neuroscience. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2020;1464(1):5–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yücel MA, Lühmann AV, Scholkmann F, et al. Best practices for fNIRS publications. Neurophotonics. 2021;8(1):012101.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Pinti P, Merla A, Aichelburg C, et al. A novel GLM-based method for the Automatic IDentification of functional Events (AIDE) in fNIRS data recorded in naturalistic environments. Neuroimage. 2017;155:291–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Friston KJ, Fletcher P, Josephs O, Holmes A, Rugg M, Turner R. Event-related fMRI: characterizing differential responses. Neuroimage. 1998;7(1):30–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Uga M, Dan I, Sano T, Dan H, Watanabe E. Optimizing the general linear model for functional near-infrared spectroscopy: an adaptive hemodynamic response function approach. Neurophotonics. 2014;1(1): 015004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Association AH. Pediatric advanced life support: provider manual. American Heart Association; 2016.

  11. Naseer N, Hong K-S. fNIRS-based brain-computer interfaces: a review. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9:3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Rossum G. Python Programming Language. Paper presented at: USENIX annual technical conference. 2007.

  13. McKinney W. Data structures for statistical computing in python. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference. 2010.

  14. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res. 2011;12:2825–30.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harris CR, Millman KJ, Van Der Walt SJ, et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature. 2020;585(7825):357–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE, et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat Methods. 2020;17(3):261–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sappia MS, Hakimi N, Colier WN, Horschig JM. Signal quality index: an algorithm for quantitative assessment of functional near infrared spectroscopy signal quality. Biomed Opt Express. 2020;11(11):6732–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Molavi B, Dumont GA. Wavelet-based motion artifact removal for functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Physiol Meas. 2012;33(2):259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang Y, Sun J, Rolfe P. RLS adaptive filtering for physiological interference reduction in NIRS brain activity measurement: a Monte Carlo study. Physiol Meas. 2012;33(6):925.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Herold F, Wiegel P, Scholkmann F, Müller NG. Applications of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) neuroimaging in exercise–cognition science: a systematic, methodology-focused review. J Clin Med. 2018;7(12):466.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Leff DR, Orihuela-Espina F, Elwell CE, et al. Assessment of the cerebral cortex during motor task behaviours in adults: a systematic review of functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) studies. Neuroimage. 2011;54(4):2922–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Abraham A, Pedregosa F, Eickenberg M, et al. Machine learning for neuroimaging with scikit-learn. Front Neuroinform. 2014;8.

  23. Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2022 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022;145(8):e153–639.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hansen M, Eriksson C, Skarica B, Meckler G, Guise J-M. Safety events in pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(3):380–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Li L-P, Liu Z-G, Zhu H-Y, Zhu L, Huang Y-C. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy in the evaluation of urban rail transit drivers’ mental workload under simulated driving conditions. Ergonomics. 2019;62(3):406–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Taylor N, Wyres M, Bollard M, Kneafsey R. Use of functional near-infrared spectroscopy to evaluate cognitive change when using healthcare simulation tools. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020;6(6):360.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhu Y, Rodriguez-Paras C, Rhee J, Mehta RK. Methodological approaches and recommendations for functional near-infrared spectroscopy applications in HF/E research. Hum Factors. 2020;62(4):613–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yücel MA, Selb J, Aasted CM, et al. Mayer waves reduce the accuracy of estimated hemodynamic response functions in functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Biomed Opt Express. 2016;7(8):3078–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Noah JA, Zhang XZ, Dravida S, et al. Comparison of short-channel separation and spatial domain filtering for removal of non-neural components in functional near-infrared spectroscopy signals. Neurophotonics. 2021;8(1): 015004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Gagnon L, Perdue K, Greve DN, Goldenholz D, Kaskhedikar G, Boas DA. Improved recovery of the hemodynamic response in diffuse optical imaging using short optode separations and state-space modeling. Neuroimage. 2011;56(3):1362–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Scholkmann F, Kleiser S, Metz AJ, et al. A review on continuous wave functional near-infrared spectroscopy and imaging instrumentation and methodology. Neuroimage. 2014;85:6–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fukuda T, Kondo Y, Hayashida K, Sekiguchi H, Kukita I. Time to epinephrine and survival after paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2018;4(3):144–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hansen M, Schmicker RH, Newgard CD, et al. Time to epinephrine administration and survival from nonshockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest among children and adults. Circulation. 2018;137(19):2032–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Molina del Río J, Guevara MA, Hernández González M, Hidalgo Aguirre RM, Cruz Aguilar MA. EEG correlation during the solving of simple and complex logical–mathematical problems. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019;19(4):1036–1046.

  35. Goel V. Hemispheric asymmetry in the prefrontal cortex for complex cognition. Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;163:179–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kotegawa K, Yasumura A, Teramoto W. Activity in the prefrontal cortex during motor imagery of precision gait: an fNIRS study. Exp Brain Res. 2020;238(1):221–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Watts PI, McDermott DS, Alinier G, et al. Healthcare simulation standards of best practiceTM simulation design. Clin Simul Nurs. 2021;58:14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Propper RE, Patel N, Christman SD, Carlei C. Superior episodic memory in inconsistent-handers: a replication and extension using fNIRS. Memory. 2017;25(10):1390–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Shirzadi S, Einalou Z, Dadgostar M. Investigation of functional connectivity during working memory task and hemispheric lateralization in left-and right-handers measured by fNIRS. Optik. 2020;221: 165347.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Yerkes RM, Dodson JD. The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit formation. J Comp Neurol Psychol. 1908;18:459–82.

Download references


Not applicable


This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute R01HL141429 awarded to Jeanne-Marie Guise, MD.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



NB participated in data collection, design, analysis, writing, and editing. JI participated in data collection, analysis, and editing. GM participated in design and conception of the study and editing. MH participated in design and conception of the study, data collection, and editing. CE participated in design and conception of the study, data collection, and editing. JG participated in the design and conception of the study and analysis, provided content expertise, and edited the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathan Bahr.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Oregon Health & Science University’s Institutional Review Board (IRB no. 00018494). Subjects were given information about the study protocol and consented to participate in the study. Participation was voluntary, and subjects were permitted to opt out at any time.

Consent for publication

Participants were informed that their activities would be video recorded and used for research purposes as part of consent to participate in the study. Researchers made efforts to remove names and blur images to minimize use of identifying information.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bahr, N., Ivankovic, J., Meckler, G. et al. Measuring cognitively demanding activities in pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Adv Simul 8, 15 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: