Brazil V, Lowe B, Ryan L, Bourke R, Scott C, Myers S, et al. Translational simulation for rapid transformation of health services, using the example of the COVID-19 pandemic preparation. Adv Simul. 2020;5(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-020-00127-z.
Article
Google Scholar
Dieckmann P, Torgeirsen K, Qvindesland SA, Thomas L, Bushell V, Langli Ersdal H. The use of simulation to prepare and improve responses to infectious disease outbreaks like COVID-19: practical tips and resources from Norway, Denmark, and the UK. Adv Simul. 2020;5(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-020-00121-5.
Article
Google Scholar
Brown A, Schofield L, Walker J, et al. 0166 ‘Ebola sim’ – an in-situ simulation to test standard operating procedures (SOPS) for a high risk patient pathway. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanced Learn. 2015;1(Suppl 2):A61. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000075.150.
Article
Google Scholar
Fung L, Boet S, Bould MD, et al. Impact of crisis resource management simulation-based training for interprofessional and interdisciplinary teams: a systematic review. J Interprof Care. 2015;29(5):433–44. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2015.1017555 published Online First: 2015/05/15.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Barsuk JH, et al. A critical review of simulation-based mastery learning with translational outcomes. Med Educ. 2014;48(4):375–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12391.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Purva M, Fent G, Prakash A. In: Armstrong M, editor. https://www.jrcptb.org.uk/news/enhancing-uk-core-medical-training-through-simulation-based-education-sbe-evidence-based: Health Education England Enhancing UK core medical training through simulation-based education (SBE): an evidence-based approach: a report from the joint JRCPTB/HEE Expert Group on Simulation in Core Medical Training; 2016.
Google Scholar
Lee R, Raison N, Lau WY, Aydin A, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K, et al. A systematic review of simulation-based training tools for technical and non-technical skills in ophthalmology. Eye. 2020;34(10):1737–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-0832-1.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Rewers M, Østergaard D. The evolution of a national, advanced airway management simulation-based course for anaesthesia trainees. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021;38(2):138–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000001268.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kattan E, De la Fuente R, Putz F, et al. Simulation-based mastery learning of bronchoscopy-guided percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: competency acquisition and skills transfer to a cadaveric model. Simul Healthc. 9000;Publish Ahead of Print. https://doi.org/10.1097/sih.0000000000000491.
Cason ML, Gilbert GE, Schmoll HH, et al. Cooperative learning using simulation to achieve mastery of nasogastric tube insertion. J Nurs Educ. 2015;54(3 Suppl):S47–51. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20150218-09 published Online First: 2015/02/19.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ghazali A, Breque C, Léger A, Scépi M, Oriot D. Testing of a complete training model for chest tube insertion in traumatic pneumothorax. Simul Healthc. 2015;10(4):239–44. https://doi.org/10.1097/sih.0000000000000071.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Boet S, Borges BCR, Naik VN, et al. Complex procedural skills are retained for a minimum of 1 yr after a single high-fidelity simulation training session<sup>†</sup>. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(4):533–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer160.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ruest AS, Getto LP, Fredette JM, Cherico A, Papas MA, Nomura JT. A novel task trainer for penile corpus cavernosa aspiration. Simul Healthc. 2017;12(6):407–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/sih.0000000000000262.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Strøm M, Rasmussen JL, Nayahangan LJ, de la Motte L, Vogt K, Konge L, et al. Learn EVAR sizing from scratch: the results of a one-day intensive course in EVAR sizing and stent graft selection for vascular trainees. Vascular. 2020;28(4):342–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1708538120913719.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC, Cohen ER, et al. Simulation-based mastery learning reduces complications during central venous catheter insertion in a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(10):2697–701 published Online First: 2009/11/04.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Vozenilek JA, O'Connor LM, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB. Simulation-based education with mastery learning improves paracentesis skills. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(1):23–7. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-11-00161.1.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Cohen ER, Feinglass J, Barsuk JH, et al. Cost savings from reduced catheter-related bloodstream infection after simulation-based education for residents in a medical intensive care unit. Simul Healthc. 2010;5(2):98–102. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181bc8304 published Online First: 2010/04/15.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Duncan DR, Morgenthaler TI, Ryu JH, Daniels CE. Reducing iatrogenic risk in thoracentesis: establishing best practice via experiential training in a zero-risk environment. CHEST. 2009;135(5):1315–20. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.08-1227.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hauglum SD, Crenshaw NA, Gattamorta KA, Mitzova-Vladinov G. Evaluation of a low-cost, high-fidelity animal model to train graduate advanced practice nursing students in the performance of ultrasound-guided central line catheter insertion. Simul Healthc. 2018;13(5):341–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/sih.0000000000000337.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zaika O, Boulton M, Eagleson R, de Ribaupierre S. Simulation reduces navigational errors in cerebral angiography training. Adv Simul. 2020;5(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-020-00125-1.
Article
Google Scholar
Lawaetz J, Skovbo Kristensen JS, Nayahangan LJ, et al. Simulation based training and assessment in open vascular surgery: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021;61(3):502–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.11.003 published Online First: 2020/12/15.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Application of the “see one, do one, teach one” concept in surgical training. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(5):1194–201. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318287a0b3.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Peyton, JWR. Teaching in the theatre. In: Teaching and learning in medical practice. Rickmansworth: Manticore Publishers Europe Ltd; 1998. p. 171–80.
Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990;65(9 Suppl):S63–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199009000-00045 published Online First: 1990/09/01.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kern DET, P.A.; Hughes, M.T. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach: JHU Press; 2009.
Google Scholar
Sawyer T, White M, Zaveri P, et al. Learn, see, practice, prove, do, maintain: an evidence-based pedagogical framework for procedural skill training in medicine. Acad Med. 2015;90(8):1025–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000734 published Online First: 2015/04/18.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Andreatta P, Dougherty P. Advancing surgical education: theory, evidence and practice. In: Nestel D, Dalrymple K, Paige JT, et al., eds. Innovation and change in professional education: Springer 2019:183-196, Supporting the Development of Psychomotor Skills, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3128-2_17.
Khan K, S T-C, S W, et al. Simulation in healthcare education. Building a simulation programme: a practical guide. Dundee: Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE); 2011.
Google Scholar
de Villiers MR, de Villiers PJ, Kent AP. The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. Med Teach. 2005;27(7):639–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260500069947 published Online First: 2005/12/08.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Løkkegaard T, Todsen T, Nayahangan LJ, et al. Point-of-care ultrasound for general practitioners: a systematic needs assessment. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020;38(1):3–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2020.1711572 published Online First: 2020/01/21.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Thim S, Nayahangan LJ, Paltved C, Jensen RD, Konge L, Hertel NT, et al. Identifying and prioritising technical procedures for simulation-based curriculum in paediatrics: a Delphi-based general needs assessment. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2020;4(1):e000697. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000697.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Bessmann EL, Østergaard HT, Nielsen BU, et al. Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in anaesthesiology: a Delphi-based general needs assessment. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019;63(6):720–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13344 published Online First: 2019/03/16.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Grant J. Learning needs assessment: assessing the need. BMJ. 2002;324(7330):156–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7330.156.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Zern SC, Marshall WJ, Shewokis PA, Vest MT. Use of simulation as a needs assessment to develop a focused team leader training curriculum for resuscitation teams. Adv Simul. 2020;5(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-020-00124-2.
Article
Google Scholar
Gustavsen PH, Nielsen DG, Paltved C, Konge L, Nayahangan LJ. A national needs assessment study to determine procedures for simulation-based training in cardiology in Denmark. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2019;53(1):35–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2019.1569716.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna HP. A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. Int J Nurs Stud. 2001;38(2):195–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7489(00)00044-4 published Online First: 2001/02/27.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Czerwińska-Jelonkiewicz K, Montero S, Bañeras J. The voice of young cardiologists. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(29):2723–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa432.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Spurr L, Barron A, Butcher C, et al. P14 Part-task training with low-fidelity simulation is an effective method of pericardiocentesis training. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanced Learn. 2017;3(Suppl 2):A50. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2017-aspihconf.102.
Article
Google Scholar
Cowan J. John Biggs 1999. Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does. High Educ 2000;40(3):374-376. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004049006757
Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, et al. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27(1):10–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500046924 published Online First: 2005/09/09.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Locke EA, Latham GP. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. Am Psychol. 2002;57(9):705–17. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.57.9.705 published Online First: 2002/09/20.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, et al. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):50–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Motola I, Devine LA, Chung HS, Sullivan JE, Issenberg SB. Simulation in healthcare education: a best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82. Med Teach. 2013;35(10):e1511–e30. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.818632.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bloom BS. Learning for mastery. Evaluation comment; Centre for the Study of Evaluation of Instructional Programs 1968;1(2):1-12.
Google Scholar
Bube S, Dagnaes-Hansen J, Mahmood O, et al. Simulation-based training for flexible cystoscopy – A randomized trial comparing two approaches. Heliyon. 2020;6(1):e03086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03086.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Gagné RM. Military training and principles of learning. Am Psychol. 1962;17(2):83–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048613.
Article
Google Scholar
Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004;79(10 Suppl):S70–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022 published Online First: 2004/09/24.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Adams RA, Gilbert GE, Buckley LA, Nino Fong R, Fuentealba IC, Little EL. A method for functional task alignment analysis of an arthrocentesis simulator. Simul Healthc. 2018;13(4):289–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/sih.0000000000000313.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Yudkowsky R, Tumuluru S, Casey P, Herlich N, Ledonne C. A patient safety approach to setting pass/fail standards for basic procedural skills checklists. Simul Healthc. 2014;9(5):277–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/sih.0000000000000044.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rehmann AJ. A Handbook of Flight Simulation Fidelity Required for Human Factors Research. 1995. https://doi.org/10.21949/1403228.
Sharma S, Boet S, Kitto S, et al. Interprofessional simulated learning: the need for 'sociological fidelity'. J Interprof Care. 2011;25(2):81–3. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2011.556514 published Online First: 2011/02/09.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Norman G, Dore K, Grierson L. The minimal relationship between simulation fidelity and transfer of learning. Med Educ. 2012;46(7):636–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04243.x published Online First: 2012/05/24.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Nimbalkar A, Patel D, Kungwani A, Phatak A, Vasa R, Nimbalkar S. Randomized control trial of high fidelity vs low fidelity simulation for training undergraduate students in neonatal resuscitation. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8(1):636. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1623-9.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Massoth C, Röder H, Ohlenburg H, Hessler M, Zarbock A, Pöpping DM, et al. High-fidelity is not superior to low-fidelity simulation but leads to overconfidence in medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1464-7.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Morrow DS, Cupp JA, Broder JS. Versatile, reusable, and inexpensive ultrasound phantom procedural trainers. J Ultrasound Med. 2016;35(4):831–41. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.04085.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Todnem N, Nguyen KD, Reddy V, Grogan D, Waitt T, Alleyne CH. A simple and cost-effective model for ventricular catheter placement training: technical note. J Neurosurg. 2021;134(5):1640–3. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.2.jns19161.
Article
Google Scholar
Reedy GB. Using cognitive load theory to inform simulation design and practice. Clin Simul Nurs. 2015;11(8):355–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.05.004.
Article
Google Scholar
Frederiksen JG, Sørensen SMD, Konge L, et al. Cognitive load and performance in immersive virtual reality versus conventional virtual reality simulation training of laparoscopic surgery: a randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(3):1244–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06887-8 published Online First: 2019/06/07.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Frithioff A, Frendø M, Mikkelsen PT, et al. Ultra-high-fidelity virtual reality mastoidectomy simulation training: a randomized, controlled trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277(5):1335–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05858-3 published Online First: 2020/02/19.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Chiniara G, Cole G, Brisbin K, et al. Simulation in healthcare: a taxonomy and a conceptual framework for instructional design and media selection. Med Teach. 2013;35(8):e1380–95. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2012.733451 published Online First: 2012/11/06.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fraser KL, Ayres P, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory for the design of medical simulations. Simul Healthc. 2015;10(5):295–307. https://doi.org/10.1097/sih.0000000000000097.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Hatala R, Zendejas B, Cook DA. Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training. Acad Med. 2014;89(3):387–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000130.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wayne DB, Siddall VJ, Butter J, et al. A longitudinal study of internal medicine residentsʼ retention of advanced cardiac life support skills. Acad Med. 2006;81(10 Suppl):S9–s12. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200610001-00004 published Online First: 2006/09/27.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Moazed F, Cohen ER, Furiasse N, Singer B, Corbridge TC, McGaghie WC, et al. Retention of critical care skills after simulation-based mastery learning. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(3):458–63. https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-13-00033.1.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ansquer R, Mesnier T, Farampour F, Oriot D, Ghazali DA. Long-term retention assessment after simulation-based-training of pediatric procedural skills among adult emergency physicians: a multicenter observational study. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):348. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1793-6.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Offiah G, Ekpotu LP, Murphy S, Kane D, Gordon A, O’Sullivan M, et al. Evaluation of medical student retention of clinical skills following simulation training. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):263. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1663-2.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Donoghue A, Navarro K, Diederich E, et al. Deliberate practice and mastery learning in resuscitation education: a scoping review. Resuscitation Plus. 2021;6:100137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100137.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Cheng A, Magid DJ, Auerbach M, et al. Part 6: Resuscitation education science: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2020;142(16_suppl_2). https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000000903.
Andersen SA, Konge L, Cayé-Thomasen P, et al. Retention of mastoidectomy skills after virtual reality simulation training. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;142(7):635–40. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2016.0454 published Online First: 2016/04/29.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cold KM, Konge L, Clementsen PF, Nayahangan LJ. Simulation-based mastery learning of flexible bronchoscopy: deciding factors for completion. Respiration. 2019;97(2):160–7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000493431.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Taras J, Everett T. Rapid cycle deliberate practice in medical education - a systematic review. Cureus. 2017;9(4):e1180. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1180 published Online First: 2017/05/26.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Cheng A, Eppich W, Grant V, et al. Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ. 2014;48(7):657–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12432 published Online First: 2014/06/10.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Eppich WJ, Hunt EA, Duval-Arnould JM, et al. Structuring feedback and debriefing to achieve mastery learning goals. Acad Med. 2015;90(11):1501–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000934 published Online First: 2015/09/17.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hunt EA, Duval-Arnould JM, Nelson-McMillan KL, et al. Pediatric resident resuscitation skills improve after “rapid cycle deliberate practice” training. Resuscitation. 2014;85(7):945–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.02.025 published Online First: 2014/03/13.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Nicholls D, Sweet L, Muller A, et al. Teaching psychomotor skills in the twenty-first century: revisiting and reviewing instructional approaches through the lens of contemporary literature. Med Teach. 2016;38(10):1056–63. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2016.1150984 published Online First: 2016/03/30.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Strandbygaard J, Bjerrum F, Maagaard M, et al. Instructor feedback versus no instructor feedback on performance in a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator: a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2013;257(5):839–44. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827eee6e published Online First: 2013/01/09.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Perretta JS, Duval-Arnould J, Poling S, et al. Best practices and theoretical foundations for simulation instruction using rapid-cycle deliberate practice. Simul Healthc. 2020;15(5):356–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/sih.0000000000000433 published Online First: 2020/08/19.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Clapper TC, Leighton K. Incorporating the reflective pause in simulation: a practical guide. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2020;51(1):32–8. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20191217-07 published Online First: 2020/01/03.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Argyris C. Double-loop learning, teaching, and research. Acad Manag Learn Educ. 2002;1(2):206–18. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2002.8509400.
Article
Google Scholar
Rudolph JW, Simon R, Rivard P, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB. Debriefing with good judgment: combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry. Anesthesiol Clin. 2007;25(2):361–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2007.03.007.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rudolph JW, Raemer DB, Simon R, et al. Simul Healthc. 2014;9(6):339–49. https://doi.org/10.1097/sih.0000000000000047 published Online First: 2014/09/05.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Molloy E, D B, E M. Changing conceptions of feedback. Routledge: Feedback in Higher and Professional Education: Understanding it and Doing It Well; 2013. p. 11–33.
Google Scholar
Tolsgaard MG, Madsen ME, Ringsted C, et al. The effect of dyad versus individual simulation-based ultrasound training on skills transfer. Med Educ. 2015;49(3):286–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12624 published Online First: 2015/02/20.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Tolsgaard MG, Rasmussen MB, Bjørck S, et al. Medical studentsʼ perception of dyad practice. Perspect Med Educ. 2014;3(6):500–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-014-0138-8 published Online First: 2014/07/31.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kolbe M, Eppich W, Rudolph J, et al. Managing psychological safety in debriefings: a dynamic balancing act. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanced Learn. 2019:bmjstel-2019-000470. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000470.
Srinivasa K, Chen Y, Henning MA. The role of online videos in teaching procedural skills to post-graduate medical learners: a systematic narrative review. Med Teach. 2020;42(6):689–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1733507.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Simpson T, Kitchen S, Lavelle M, et al. Evaluaiton Practice Toolkit. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/study/learningteaching/kli/research/ceps-research-group/evaluation-toolkit-1-developing-your-evaluation-strategy: King’s College London, 2017.
Google Scholar
Cook DA, Brydges R, Zendejas B, et al. Mastery learning for health professionals using technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med. 2013;88(8):1178–86. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31829a365d published Online First: 2013/06/29.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cohen ER, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB, et al. Recommendations for reporting mastery education research in medicine (ReMERM). Acad Med. 2015;90(11):1509–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000933.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Yardley S, Teunissen PW, Dornan T. Experiential learning: AMEE Guide No. 63. Med Teach. 2012;34(2):e102–15. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2012.650741 published Online First: 2012/02/01.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gaba D, Howard SK, Fish K, et al. Simulation-based training in anesthesia crisis resource management (ACRM): a decade of experience. Simul Gaming. 2001;32(2):175–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/104687810103200206.
Article
Google Scholar
Zerth H, Harwood R, Tommaso L, et al. An inexpensive, easily constructed, reusable task trainer for simulating ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis. J Emerg Med. 2012;43(6):1066–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.05.066 published Online First: 2011/09/20.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar